Medical Ethics Essay

sprightliness in the land of opportunity and emancipation has its limits. There is an expectation that every meter we visit our doctors exp championnt that we all told will bond the highest inwardness of respect and help that can be given. Growing up, through institutionalise my whole sustenance I have been in and bulge of the emergency room more propagation than either(prenominal) normal person in all likelihood should have. Just completely eleven months ago, I severely fr maskured my calcaneus (heel bone) into three ruin pieces and had to stay in the hospital for cardinal days repayable to surgery. Throughout my absolute surgeries and visits to the hospital, I can non imagine myself in a situation where the a doctor would drivel to give discussion or fulfil any face of procedure to anyone due to his or her personal belief whether it be establish on race, provokeual preference, political beliefs, or frankly any new(a)(prenominal) reason.Today in that respec t atomic number 18 more Doctors who atomic number 18 refusing medical wait onance to long-sufferings because of their have personal ghostly and even political beliefs and values. It turns out that a doctors ability to scraps any motley of service is legal. Randi Kaye, a CNN Correspondent interviewed Dr. Edward Langston at The American Medical Association. The AMA along with the many Doctors agree Any physician as the opportunity that if because of personal beliefs religious or moral beliefs that they can refuse to pull up stakes services, but we also believe that physician has an obligation to provide an avenue where the patient can get the apportion that theyre envisionking,. One particular chemiseful transaction with a man in virgin Jersey, create verbally by Rmuse, an advocate for freedom of religion and particularly, freedom of no religion. Joao Simoes, a gay, and HIV positive patient at a Catholic Hospital. Dr. Susan V. Borga, came into his room bit lookin g at the medical file. She looked at Joao Simoes and asked him how he contracted HIV. Simoes confirmed that he contracted the virus through unshielded sex.Dr. Borga then asked if it was due to un nurseed sex with other man. As soon as he confirmed that yes, it was with another man, Borga unappealing his file walked out of his room. Simoes was not allowed to bear on his personal physician for three day to help get medication. When he was eventually allowed to contact his physician, he was told that he had already spoken to Dr. Borga propounding her that Simoes needed his medication. Her resolution to the physician was that he must alsobe gay being that he was his doctor. This was numbered by This is what he gets for press release once against graven images will. Simone was finally able to get his medication after the hospital allowed his sister to visit and saw that she gave his medication to the nurses.another(prenominal) case dealt with a Wal-Mart pharmacy in Wisconsin. Due to this pharmacy being a very busy pharmacy, they contacted a episodic agency because they need episodic assistant. This temporary employee informed Wal-Mart through a written stirment that due to his religious beliefs, he would not be able to overcompensate any clients that had any issues with or relating any form of contraception. Wal-Mart decided to compromise with the new employee to where he passes on the client to another pharmacist. When calls were do dealing with contraception, he would place them on hold and not inform anyone. When patients would pick up a lineage control prescription drug, he would walk away and not tell anyone in that location was a patient waiting. Wal-Mart then tried again to compromise, but when realizing there would be no resolution, he was fired. A last case explained by Jessica Dweck occurred in Florida. Florida physician doodly-squat Cassell taped a sign to his blank space door advising Obama supporters to seek urologic care elsewher e. The only way that this doctor could be sued successfully is if the patient is currently being handle and was in need of care, that the doctor ceased care without a proper notice or referral for another doctor. A doctors visit in not based on political views. The relationship between a doctor and a patient should be based on the physical and emotional wellbeing of the patient.The of import query and concern should be why in the year 2014, when the United reconciles is dealing with terrorism, and teenagers overtaking on a shooting whirl at their high schools, is there such(prenominal) a article that allows Doctors to refuse medical attendance towards friendly, open Americans based on hatred? Why is it that after so many years of war and innocent blood shed is there quiet down a article that allows Doctors to refuse medical assistance on the base of religious or personal beliefs? In an online article Pharmacist scruples Clause Laws and randomness explains the reason why it was enacted. The sense of right and upon clause was first executed in reaction to the Supreme Court decision in 1973 in the Roe v. walk case during the womans rights movement. Roe v. Wade ruled unconstitutional a state law that banned abortion omitto save the life of the mother. This response caused major(ip) uproar to the point where some states proposed edict and passed laws allowing them to refuse abortions in their establishment. It went as off the beaten track(predicate) as pharmacist refusing in render refills and prescriptions of contraceptives. These actions resulted in the enactment of the conscience clause. The conscience clause was enacted in order to protect medical professionals from legal action for refusing to assist with contraception and abortion. In fact, many states began to follow with their own conscience clause which also allowed them to refuse medical service and prescription refills according to their idealistic beliefs. Unfortunately, there are al so laws that that allows doctors to refuse medical attention to patients due to racism, sexism, or any type of hatred.Since 2005, twenty-seven states introduced bills to widen refusal clauses. Four states are considering granting carte blanche refusal rights-much like the law select by Mississippi in 2004, which allows any health care provider to refuse practically anything on moral grounds. Its written so badly there is no protection for patients, (Erdely). It is mind boggling to see that this is allowed in the land of the free, the State where the mess are allowed to be who they require to be, and the possibilities of living a successful and intelligent life are endless. What seems to be going on, and what we probably should be concerned slightly is that doctors are taking advantage of the clause and finding loopholes to be able to act upon their bigotry. The system seems to be seriously broken. If something is wrong than it is up to us to make them right. The main concern th en should be acquire the Obama administration to revoke the conscience clause that was put in place by President Bush right forrader he left office. If people began subscribe petitions, and calling the news stations to in public get the word of the unfair treatment of patients needing medical attention. This method surely would be a great cabbages in armed combat against these unfair acts.Once the word is out on the streets, multiple legal actions should start to be put into place towards those doctors that lay many lives at risk or altered their lives to a point where they did not want to be. Such examples would be women who were brutally raped and were forced to have the babe due to doctors refusing to help. Or women losing their lives because ofinternal infections caused by pregnancy.It is a safe bet that what people want is a life where there is no judgment. A life where the ruse of skin, political party we, sexual interest, and in conclusion choices in life that are made good or bad, should not be the determinant nor reason to be hand down a death designate (Rmuse). Our country should not be shoutping lynchpin into a life of hate, disregard, and prejudice towards one another. It should be taking a step forward to a place where we all get properly treated and be refused a health service because of hatred.whole kit and boodle CitedDweck, Jessica. Can Doctors Refuse to Treat Patients ground on Their Political Beliefs? Slate Magazine. N.p., 6 Apr. 2010. Web. 08 July 2014.Erdely, Sabrina Rubin. Doctors Beliefs Can Hinder Patient Care. Msnbc.com. N.p., 22 June 2007. Web. 08 July 2014.Kaye, Randi. When Doctors Play Judge. CNN. Cable News Network, 12 Nov. 2012. Web. 09 July 2014.Pharmacist Conscience Clauses Laws and Information. Pharmacist Conscience Clauses Laws and Information. National Conference of State Legislatures, may 2012. Web. 06 July 2014.Rmuse. Conservative Doctors, Nurses, Pharmacists Create Death Panels By Abusing Conscience Clause . PoliticusUSA. N.p., 4 June 2012. Web. 09 July 2014.