One Man, One Vote? Essay -- essays research papers

One Man, One Vote?Joseph Farkas cogitates that every right to suffrage protrude should equal every other vote.He feels that many tidy sum are voting without knowing why they are voting for a received someone or why they arent voting for another. He orders that a vote affirmby a person with no or very minute companionship in the preference should not count asmuch as a vote cast by a person who knows alot or so the election. The peoplewho care about(predicate) who has an essential role in the government should have a largesay in who is going to have that important role. The votes cast by a person whodoesnt really know why they are voting for someone should not equal as much asan election educated person.I do not find that this is a good idea at all. It would not encouragepeople to learn more than about the election but keep them away from the voting area.It will probably withdraw people not want to vote because many of them would thinkthat their vote will not mean as much to the election. It would make the peoplewho are familiar with the candidates want to vote because they would have abigger say in who gets elected. It would be very hard to decide who know whatabout the running candidates and issues that are being addressed. They wouldhave to give some considerate of multiple-choice question test that you had to fill outwhile voting. It would take a long time for each person to vote and I think thatwould make people less encouraged to come and vote. Sin... One Man, One Vote? Essay -- essays research papers One Man, One Vote?Joseph Farkas thinks that every vote cast should equal every other vote.He feels that many people are voting without knowing why they are voting for acertain person or why they arent voting for another. He says that a vote castby a person with no or very little knowledge in the election should not count asmuch as a vote cast by a person who knows alot about the election. The peoplewho care about who has an i mportant role in the government should have a biggersay in who is going to have that important role. The votes cast by a person whodoesnt really know why they are voting for someone should not equal as much asan election educated person.I do not think that this is a good idea at all. It would not encouragepeople to learn more about the election but keep them away from the voting area.It will probably make people not want to vote because many of them would thinkthat their vote will not mean as much to the election. It would make the peoplewho are familiar with the candidates want to vote because they would have abigger say in who gets elected. It would be very hard to decide who know whatabout the running candidates and issues that are being addressed. They wouldhave to give some kind of multiple-choice question test that you had to fill outwhile voting. It would take a long time for each person to vote and I think thatwould make people less encouraged to come and vote. Sin...